Monthly Archives: November 2013

Colonialism and the buyers’ market in au pairs.

A recent article in the Daily Telegraph reported one potential au pair host receiving over 2000 responses after advertising for an au pair online.  The article reports in some detail that this over-supply of au pairs is a result of the economic crisis in Spain.  This is a trend that we have also seen in our research, with highly qualified people, who are older than average for au pairs, coming to the UK with the aim of learning English and using au pairing as the way to do it.

The result – as the Telegraph article outlines – is a ‘buyers’ market’ in au pairs which has driven down the demand for nannies and driven up the level of skill demanded from au pairs.  The fact that the perilous situation of the Spanish economy should be a boon for British families looking for childcare might be unexpected but in fact, au pairing works for UK families only because of a number of similar global-scale economic and social trends.

The most important of these is the English language and demand for English skills around the world.  The place of English as a ‘global language’ is a result of centuries of formal and informal imperial relationships, forged first by Britain and later by the USA.  In our research we’ve found that ‘learning English’ is the motivator for au pairs to come to the UK.  As one au pair told me:

‘we are a servant, and all au pairs say “I came here to study English.”  Well, that’s our reason, nobody comes here to clean other peoples’ houses, that’s the money that we don’t have.  If we had money we would go to a college and study here but we don’t have money so we have to work.’

For most, au pairing is not a fun gap year, but part of a carefully planned career path.  Many au pairs we’ve interviewed talked of au pairing as ‘the only option’, or having ‘no alternative.’  This was because of a lack of work in their home countries and the emphasis placed on good English by employers.  The motivation for these au pairs to move to England was underlain by global economic processes, such as the crisis in Spain, and the growth of global trade and tourism causing demand for language skills.  The result is the ‘buyers’ market’ which makes au pairs vulnerable to abuse by unscrupulous employers who know how desperate they are to try this route to a better future.

Unequal colonial and post colonial relationships have shaped paid domestic work in many ways, but au pairing is not often thought of as being part of these.  Au pairs are always imagined as bright young things having fun in a foreign country before they settle down to the serious business of real life.  For far too many a ‘real life’ in their home countries is proving difficult to achieve.  The English language has become one route by which Britain’s past imperial enterprises are benefiting middle-class families in the UK today as they find every more highly qualified, low-cost, childcare available if they can only sift through the thousands of applicationsImage.

Photos from


1 Comment

Filed under Au pairs, Housework, Paid domestic work

Wave of misogyny in British Universities

On Friday 15th November this article about sexism in British universities was published in the Guardian.  The article documents a number of incidents that have taken place in recent weeks where female student have been subject to threats of rape and assault, all justified with the phrase ‘just banter’.  For ‘educated’, ‘intelligent’ young men it seems raping women, treating them like objects, forcing them to miscarry are just all terribly funny and woe betide any woman who does not see the joke.  The article reveals not only a lack of respect for women, but also a violent hatred.

The article filled me with rage. After I read it I shook with anger at these young men who are going to leave university, go off into privileged positions in the world of work, probably get married and even have daughters, all without ever realising that women are equally human to them and have just the same rights to enter universities, succeed in the world of work and have sex on their own terms.  So many years after ‘women’s liberation’ how has it come to this?  

Two things struck me after the reading the article.  The first was that despite the fact a large number of the women academics I follow on twitter tweeted the article or made comments on it, not a single man did.  Could they really not have seen it, even though it was about the industry they work in?  Or was it just not important to them?

The second was about the responsibilities that we as academics have to combat sexism, racism and homophobia on campus.  This made me think about someone I know who is a student at the moment.  She told me that this term two of the three modules she is taking have NO readings from women on the reading lists – she is studying English and Film subjects with no shortage of women researchers.  Two of her lecturers could think of NOTHING that women had contributed to their areas of study.  That is so absurd and offensive.  If women are treated like that and represented like that inside the classroom, of course they are going to be derided outside it.  If male students see that their lecturers can overlook or despise the contribution of women to the important things that they study, why shouldn’t those same students think they can despise women in general?  I’m not saying for a single minute that putting a few books by women on a reading list is going to solve the problem of sexism but a concerted effort by university staff to represent women and people of colour at all times as worthy of respect would at least be a start.  

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized